#VILE VORTICES DEBUNKED SERIES#

I support this theory, one of the Green Lanterns (Walts Comic Book) many enemies is Nekron, the Fear Parasite, who would subject his victims to a mysterious gas which would suddenly make them experience visions of their own deaths. The only question is how much you meander between spots.В :)ДЄ lot on the island works with artificially generated fear In the interview I read with him (on the Fuselage, I think) he likened it to a cross-country road trip you know where you started, where you'll eventually end up, and most of the major sights you want to see along the way.

#VILE VORTICES DEBUNKED SERIES#

skks 12:37, 24 March 2006 (PST)ДЄctually I think Javi has said that they do know how the series is going to end and all the major things that happen along the way. In a sense, I don't see the point doing any 'macro-theorizing' as it serves no purpose, the writers don't have a global theory that explains everything, why should we? I suppose they can always leave it as a question when the series ends, wouldn't be the first time. skks 03:16, 23 March 2006 (PST)ДЄctually, I'm not even sure that they have a master plan or anything to explain it all nor am I sure they ever will have. There's some structure though, they probably have a general season-by-season plan on what's supposed to happen, and then fill the in-betweens with 'whatever-material'. So they use us to create the shows mythos and also avoid and change direction on somethings that they started to keep us firing and coming up with new ideas. Then the producers collate and derive the overall structure of the show from that. Well probably more accurate is my thought that they feed you so little you invent the connections and reasons and make the leaps that only the mass cluster of minds, that is the internet, can make. I am heading towards the Douglas Adam's -esque theory of how the show develops.Д®very time someone comes close to the current intent and direction of the show or any of its elements. they would be useful if putting the numbers in is a kind of conformity experiment (not -unlikely) should it be removed as a con? How can the numbers be unexplained in the context of a social experiment? they act as something otherwise without meaning or use (an neutral stimulus?). Should we let this page continue to grow, or should we remove theories as they've been debunked? - X S G 19:07, (PDT) I believe that the 'remanants of last humanity' theory was debunked by the most recent episode. Scottkj 22:52, 24 July 2006 (PDT) What to do when a theory is debunked? Scottkj 20:59, 24 July 2006 (PDT)ДЄlternately, this page could be expanded to discuss the interpetation of LOST. The intro is adequately covered by Lostpedia's Theory Policy. Peephole 12:58, 24 July 2006 (PDT)ДЄGREE: This page is messy and difficult to navigate. 31 Alternate Reality, Locke, and other mysteries.Дelete: I created a category for theories: here.28 The Others and the Original Island People: A Mental Backup Theory.21.2.1 My advice regarding the parodies, once moved.15 A Theory that could explain a lot of facts.5 A lot on the island works with artificially generated fear.3 Island is an ongoing social experiment.2 What to do when a theory is debunked?.

Vile vortices debunked